|
Return-Path: highlander@prysm.net Received: from ns2.prysm.net by [my site] with SMTP (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA18777; Wed, 21 Aug 1996 10:21:07 -0700 Received: from min01-1.prysm.net (min01-1.prysm.net [207.16.245.40]) by ns2.prysm.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA10389; Wed, 21 Aug 1996 04:57:57 -0500 Message-Id: <199608210957.EAA10389@ns2.prysm.net> Comments: Authenticated sender is <highlander@prysm.net> From: "Nikola" <none@prysm.net> To: highlander@prysm.net Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 04:58:29 +0000 Subject: 10 Cents a Minute Long Distance, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!! Reply-To: none@prysm.net Return-Receipt-To: none@prysm.net |
| Figure 1: Mail Headers |
In this case it looks like highlander@prysm.net sent the mail and tried to make it look like it came from none@prysm.net (Nikola). While you can verify that highlander@prysm.net is a valid email address, you never know whether it is the email address of the offending spammer, his name for the mailing list, or whether it is some sort of auto-responder. Sometimes, there is only one way to find out...
|
Errors-To: homebiz@flock.MWCI.NET Received: from crc3.concentric.net (ip114.cleveland.oh.interramp.com [38.11.118.114]) by darius.cris.com (8.7.5) id AAA17807; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Comments: Authenticated sender is <phantom9@pop3.concentric.net> From: "Eddie Davidson" <homebiz@flock.MWCI.NET> To: joe545@aol.com Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:47:14 +0000 Subject: ~~FLOODGATE~~ Reply-to: massemail@aol.com |
| Figure 2: Mail Header |
To whom it may concern,If you don't receive a response from this, then you may want to consider the Annoyed Method.Please alert me that you have received this email and then remove the following email addresses from your mailing list:
your@address
your@other.address
etc.